M104 R0–15 EPIC camera comparison

Previous mixed contract vs. traditional 3B masked full region · ObsID 0900170101

Published on

July 13, 2026

Executive conclusion

The traditional 3B full-region result confirms that pn0 still provides the strongest single-camera Fe-L statistics, but the degree of "PN dominating MOS" in the previous comparison was amplified by the shorter GTI and smaller BACKSCAL extraction area of the 4B MOS.

In 0.7–1.05 keV:

  • Previous mixed contract(4B MOS + 3B pn0): MOS1+MOS2 net counts are 3,516, pn0 is 8,592, and the pn/MOS net-count ratio is 2.44;
  • Traditional 3B masked full region(3B MOS1+MOS2+pn0): MOS1+MOS2 net counts increase to 5,534, pn0 remains 8,592, and the pn/MOS net-count ratio drops to 1.55;
  • The MOS-only naive independent-counts S/N increases from 44.7 to 56.4; the naive S/N after adding pn0 increases from 85.5 to 92.2;
  • The 3B MOS1/MOS2/pn0 Fe-L high/low values are 0.559 / 0.597 / 0.585, respectively. MOS1–PN0 and MOS2–PN0 differ by only −0.71σ and +0.37σ;
  • pn0 is therefore still worth including in the controlled MOS+PN forward-folded validation fit, but neither the 1.63 nor the 1.91 counts-space S/N ratio is a kT precision forecast.

English summary. The all-3B comparison recovers substantially more MOS counts because the traditional MOS products have longer exposures and larger extraction footprints/BACKSCAL sky areas. PN0 remains the strongest single-camera Fe-L dataset, but its net-count advantage over MOS1+MOS2 decreases from 2.44 to 1.55. The response/area-normalized Fe-L colors remain statistically compatible. These are QPB-subtracted quick-look spectra, not fitted source-component significances; the counts-space gain is not a kT precision forecast.

Two data contracts

Detector Previous mixed Exposure / PHA area Traditional 3B Exposure / PHA area
MOS1 4.background masked full-FOV alias 65.76 ks / 120.3 arcmin² 3B.background_20250124/...exclude_extent_source_mask 78.81 ks / 162.6 arcmin²
MOS2 4.background masked full-FOV alias 65.23 ks / 335.0 arcmin² 3B.background_20250124/...exclude_extent_source_mask 80.03 ks / 396.9 arcmin²
pn0 3B.background_20250124/...pn0...mask 55.37 ks / 369.8 arcmin² The same pn0 PHA/QPB/ARF/RMF 55.37 ks / 369.8 arcmin²

The PHA, QPB, ARF, and RMF SHA256 of PN0 are identical across the two contracts, so it is a strict control; the old-vs-new curve differences come only from the MOS products. The MOS and PN camera footprints are still not a pixel-identical common aperture.

Direct old–new comparison

0.4–3.2 keV ARF-unfolded surface brightness

Stacked previous mixed and traditional 3B R0-15 EPIC ARF-unfolded spectra

Download PDF

The two panels explicitly use the same x/y scales (sb_flux y-limit = 9×10⁻⁸–3×10⁻⁵). The overall shape is stable over 0.4–1.2 keV; the strong structures near 1.49 and 1.74 keV belong to the instrumental-line-sensitive region. In 2–3.2 keV the 3B MOS sb_flux can be higher by ~12–25%, which more likely reflects GTI, residual particle/SP, and response-weighting differences and cannot be directly interpreted as hotter source plasma.

0.6–1.2 keV Fe-L zoom

Stacked previous mixed and traditional 3B Fe-L zoom spectra

Download PDF

In the traditional 3B the MOS curves have smaller errors and more grouped bins; the Fe-L continuum slopes of the three instruments remain compatible. The figure has no model or fit and cannot distinguish M104, foreground, CXB, soft proton, and OoT components.

0.7–1.05 keV quantitative comparison

Previous mixed contract

Detector Source Scaled QPB Net S/N QPB fraction Mean ARF
MOS1 1,750 582 1,168 27.5 33.3% 172 cm²
MOS2 4,129 1,781 2,348 35.5 43.1% 164 cm²
pn0 12,447 3,855 8,592 72.9 31.0% 495 cm²

Traditional 3B masked full region

Detector Source Scaled QPB Net S/N QPB fraction Mean ARF
MOS1 2,987 1,029 1,958 35.2 34.4% 173 cm²
MOS2 6,088 2,513 3,575 44.3 41.3% 160 cm²
pn0 12,447 3,855 8,592 72.9 31.0% 495 cm²

MOS change of 3B relative to previous

Detector Exposure PHA area Net counts S/N Net rate per area Approx. sb_flux
MOS1 +19.8% +35.2% +67.7% +28.0% +3.5% +2.9%
MOS2 +22.7% +18.5% +52.3% +24.9% +4.8% +7.1%
pn0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

The conclusion is: most of the increase is counts and S/N brought by the MOS BACKSCAL extraction area × exposure, not an instrumental effective-area (ARF) or surface-brightness rise. The Fe-L mean ARF changes by only +0.6%/−2.2%, and sb_flux by only ~3–7%.

Fe-L color consistency

Physical half-open bands: low [0.700,0.875) keV, high [0.875,1.050) keV. Statistics use the RMF-channel midpoint lo <= E_mid < hi to avoid double-counting the nonlinear pn EBOUNDS boundary channel.

The errors and z-scores in the table below are count/QPB-statistical only: they propagate only source Poisson and QPB STAT_ERR, assume the two bands are independent, and exclude ARF/RMF calibration, soft-proton, sky/OoT, and common systematic errors.

Contract MOS1 high/low MOS2 high/low pn0 high/low MOS1–PN0 MOS2–PN0
Previous mixed 0.517 ± 0.039 0.589 ± 0.033 0.585 ± 0.017 −1.61σ +0.11σ
Traditional 3B 0.559 ± 0.032 0.597 ± 0.027 0.585 ± 0.017 −0.71σ +0.37σ

After 3B processing the MOS1–pn0 difference shrinks; MOS2 agrees with pn0 in both contracts. This change is consistent with sensitivity to the compound processing/footprint contract, but since PHA, QPB, ARF, and RMF all change at once, the specific cause cannot be isolated, and this does not constitute a precision cross-calibration measurement.

Traditional 3B-only inspect

Broad sb_flux

Traditional 3B-only MOS1 MOS2 pn0 broad ARF-unfolded spectrum

PDF

Fe-L zoom sb_flux

Traditional 3B-only MOS1 MOS2 pn0 Fe-L zoom

PDF

All inspections use xsherpa.inspect.SpectrumInspector; energy = 0.4–3.2 keV; group_subtracted_oversampling_SNR(sampling_rate=5, SNR=6); QPB subtraction; y-log; no model; no fit. The mandatory rate, sb, sb_flux, and 1col/2col PNG/PDF are all kept in the local science output.

Scientific limits

  1. QPB-subtracted is not pure M104. The spectra still contain sky foreground/background, CXB, residual soft protons, instrumental residuals, and possible pn OoT.
  2. PATTERN==0 is not an OoT correction。 pn0 is a single-pixel/high-resolution selection; the Extended Full Frame OoT must be handled separately by the matched OoT product.
  3. The mask is not a common aperture. The chip gaps, bad pixels, and camera coverage of MOS1/MOS2/pn differ; PHA BACKSCAL records only the respective extraction area, not the ARF instrumental effective area.
  4. ARF-unfold is for quick-look only. Quantitative inference for extended sources must use forward-folded detector-specific models.
  5. 3B does not automatically become the production baseline because of this. It provides more MOS statistics, but the previous project had its GTI/QPB screening reasons for adopting 4B. A decision requires MOS-only and MOS+pn forward-folded validation fits under the same source/background/GTI/OoT contract.

Reproducibility and downloads

Independent audit status

All published science assets are byte-bound to their local source artifacts by SHA256 in asset_manifest.json. The manifest also records the Git HEAD; because the working tree is uncommitted, the formal release identity is the per-asset SHA256 set rather than a clean commit.

中文